JEI Structural Engineering are specialists in design calculations for the glazing industry. Projects include blast, storefront, curtain wall, railing, glass entry,underwater viewing glass, value engineering, speaking and training.
Monday, October 9, 2017
Vitrum 2017 JEI Structural Engineering - Introduction
Cladding Design
Cladding design, cladding detail, cladding drawings and more.
We're cladding engineer & design, cladding engineering working on composite panel design, metal panel detail, and metal panel design.Universities do not teach aluminum panel design, aluminum panel detail, composite panel detail, composite panel design, or metal panel design.
Finding an experienced cladding engineer in aluminum consulting, or aluminum detail working as an aluminum engineer isn't easy. JEI Structural Engineering is to "go to" for glazing contractors, manufacturer and architects.
Saturday, August 19, 2017
New Patent Curtain Wall Anchor - Test Project 1
Curtain Wall Engineer - New Patented Curtain Wall Anchor.
At JEI Structural Engineering, our team is innovative and solves problems. We've invented and patented a new curtain wall anchor system that is available for sell or license now.
Curtain wall design, curtain wall details, curtain wall detail, glass curtain wall details
Having a curtain wall plan and curtain wall detail are the first step to curtain wall engineering. Glazing contractors need curtain wall drawings or a curtain wall drawing. A curtain wall engineer with curtain wall calculations can offer curtain wall consulting.At JEI Structural Engineering, our team is innovative and solves problems. We've invented and patented a new curtain wall anchor system that is available for sell or license now.
Temporary Set Up To Hold Glass In Place
Shop Drawings & Details
We work on curtain wall details, curtain wall detail, facade detail, glass wall detail, and structural glazing details. Facade detail, glass balustrade detail, glass wall detail, glass detail, glass floor detail. Cladding detail, structural glazing detail, glass canopy detail.Glazing detail, glass plan, glass wall plan, window wall detail. JEI Structural Engineering offers storefront detail, curtain wall drawings. Facade drawings, metal panel detail, glass rail detail, glass stair detail, glass staircase detail. Skylight drawing, storefront drawings, aluminum detail, and aluminum panel detail. Our team are experts in cladding drawings, compost panel detail, glass floor drawing, glass wall drawing, glazing drawings, glazing plan, skylight drawings, glass curtain wall detail, glass curtain wall details, window mullion details and more.
Thursday, August 10, 2017
Curtain Wall - Structurally Sealed Vertical Example
Curtain Wall - Structurally Sealed Vertical Example
JEI Structural Engineers show an example of structural sealant use in curtain wall design. Our goal is to help educate those new to our industry on common terms and examples from live projects so jobs run smoothly.
Glass and Glazing Sealants are prevalent.
Structural glazing systems, in their simplest form, are types of
curtain wall systems consisting of glass that is bonded or anchored back to a
structure without the use of continuously gasketed aluminum pressure plates or
caps.
Structurally glazed systems create a greater transparency than
traditional captured systems. There are less visual interruptions due to the
lack of metal on the, creating a seamless, continuous glass look.
The main types are:
Stick-built structural glazing system
Unitized structural glazing system
Point supported glass systems
Sunday, July 16, 2017
Glass Storefront Engineering & Glazing Challenges
Glass Storefront Install & Engineering Challenges
New Project
Specs Require “Sealed Calculations” for storefronts. (That’s engineering!)
Most
manufacture Wind load charts DO NOT fully account for updated code
requirements.
In the past,
there were loopholes that allowed engineers more flexibility than the current ADM
2015 requirements on open shapes. This can
mislead glazing project managers costing more steel, higher engineering &
lost time.
Add to that,
the issue of Building Movement, which is required by delegated design to
consider.
As you know,
the impact of designing and installing a storefront wrong isn’t life
threatening, so a few people overlook the issues entirely. Preferring to bury their head in the sand. The result is minor system failures that may
cause water leaks or damage and sometimes require system replacement. At
worst, it’s a lawsuit.
At some
point, all the codes will catch up to the new standards. JEI Structural Engineering is ahead of the
learning curve, developing:
· Custom Wind Load Charts with lateral
buckling checks, according to code.
· Calculation and design methods that
reduce steel.
· Pre-Design assist that Anticipates
Building Movement at the storefront head.
At JEI, we
realize glazing contractors want: speed of service, high quality communication
and fair prices.
Get us in the
loop early and we’ll help spot potential obstacles and road blocks, freeing you
to deliver the caliber of services a tradesman can be proud of.
For a free
quote, send construction documents to Info@JEIstructural.com
or Call 816-505-0987
www.JEIstructural.com
Currently JEI Structural Engineering has PE’s in
AR, AL, CO, CT, DC, FL, GA, IA, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, MS, MT, NC, NE, NJ, NY, OH, OK, PA, SC, TN, TX, UT VA, WA, WV and growing.
Storefront design, storefront detail, storefront consulting, storefront drawing, and storefront drawings.
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Codes Changes Creating a Cladding Mess
If you’re a glazing contractor or a building envelop
contractor; an estimator or project manager, you’ve probably tried to size your
storefront and curtain wall members off of a wind design pressure.
The wind design criteria are usually given on the contract
structural drawings. Sometimes design
wind pressures for components and cladding are given as well. However, the changes with the 2012 IBC have
created much confusion regarding the actual design pressures to be used.
Many times the components and cladding pressures listed on
the structural drawings are given in terms of “Ultimate strength design”, which
is not used in any of the wind load charts given by manufactures. Using these pressures will ultimately lead
to overly conservative design.
Designers need to be able to calculate the allowable strength
design loads from the information given off of the structural drawings.
If you have a question about what is on a structural
drawing, give us a call.
Stewart Jeske
816-734-8345
Friday, August 24, 2012
Can you break me down the difference in Explosive Weight I and Explosive Weight II?
Explosive Weight I and Explosive Weight
II?
Question
Can you break me down the difference in Explosive Weight I and Explosive Weight II?
Answer
This is the criteria from the
2012 UFC:
Explosive weight I is associated
with a larger weight of TNT for a van or truck bomb outside of the base
perimeter. Its based on the assumption that a vehicle bomb will not
be able to penetrate the base perimeter and/or will be detected at the
gate. If we have a facility that is less than 200 feet from the base
perimeter/fence, then we must consider explosive weight I in addition to
explosive weight II and its pressure/impulse may govern over the explosive
weight II.
Explosive weight II is
associated with a smaller weight of TNT simulating a back-pack or smaller bomb
that gets past the base gate. The standoff for this explosive weight is
no longer the 82 feet typical of the 2007 criteria. Now it is based on
the new conventional stand-offs that are listed in the tables based on
construction type and load bearing/non-load bearing walls. The actual
stand-off must be used which is from the parking lot to the window/wall in question.
Hope this helps. Please
call if you have any questions.
Stewart P. Jeske, P.E.
JEI Structural - Glazing Systems
Engineering
Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Updated UFC 4-010-01 (2012) - Impact to Glazing Contractors
Based on a quick review, here are the major changes/impact that I see:
1) The biggest change – Conventional Construction Stand-Off Distances. This is a huge change!
They have re-identified the conventional construction stand-off distances in Table B-2 based on the wall type construction. I anticipate the net effect will be a moving to wall construction which minimizes the construction stand-off due to spacial constraints associated with military bases. So for reinforce masonry and concrete and wood studs w/brick that means about 30 feet and 16 feet and 36 ft respectively! Glazing systems with these requirements will not likely be able to have static equivalent calculations performed – They will be forced to dynamic analysis. I anticipate that these types of installations will start showing up late summer to fall of this year.
2) Another major impact – Testing Requirements. This is also huge! The requirements state that the testing must meet the appropriate pressure and impulse from the applicable standoff and explosive weight. So, given the changes with the Conventional Construction Stand-Off Distances most all of the manufacture’s blast testing (at 82′ Ex weight II and 144′ Ex weight I) will be obsolete! I feel badly for all of the manufacture’s who have invested a great deal of effort and resource to testing in the past 5 years.
3) Dynamic analysis is pushed. Under paragraph B-3.1.3 ASTM F 2248 Design Approach (This is the 3-second static equivalent method) they state, “In order to reduce the conservatism associated with using the ASTM methodology, the window systems may be designed using dynamic analysis or tested …”
4) Framing calculations under the static equivalent method is changed. Framing must now be shown adequate with a design load of 2x the glazing resistance instead of the 3-second equivalent blast load. In some cases (with small glass lites governing – Its usually the case that the Architect is unaware) this will be the difference between 50psf (typical 3-sec load) and 400 – 1200 psf! L/60 is used as a deflection limit now instead of L/160, but I don’t think that will help much – sections will need to be much stronger using this method.
5) Connections and anchors under static equivalent method is changed. The connections and anchors must be designed for either 1x or 2x the glazing resistance instead of the typical loop holes that we have seen 2x the 3-second load (usually 100psf). Anchors and connections at these loads will be difficult if the controlling glazing lite in an elevation is small. I think anchors into masonry and wood and light-gage steel will not be workable with this method.
6) We are now able to Use ultimate strength design instead of allowable stress, but again this helps little in light of the major changes above.
Stewart Jeske, PE
Connect with us on Linkedin
Check out other blog topics at our website.
Follow us on Facebook.
Email reprint request.
1) The biggest change – Conventional Construction Stand-Off Distances. This is a huge change!
They have re-identified the conventional construction stand-off distances in Table B-2 based on the wall type construction. I anticipate the net effect will be a moving to wall construction which minimizes the construction stand-off due to spacial constraints associated with military bases. So for reinforce masonry and concrete and wood studs w/brick that means about 30 feet and 16 feet and 36 ft respectively! Glazing systems with these requirements will not likely be able to have static equivalent calculations performed – They will be forced to dynamic analysis. I anticipate that these types of installations will start showing up late summer to fall of this year.
2) Another major impact – Testing Requirements. This is also huge! The requirements state that the testing must meet the appropriate pressure and impulse from the applicable standoff and explosive weight. So, given the changes with the Conventional Construction Stand-Off Distances most all of the manufacture’s blast testing (at 82′ Ex weight II and 144′ Ex weight I) will be obsolete! I feel badly for all of the manufacture’s who have invested a great deal of effort and resource to testing in the past 5 years.
3) Dynamic analysis is pushed. Under paragraph B-3.1.3 ASTM F 2248 Design Approach (This is the 3-second static equivalent method) they state, “In order to reduce the conservatism associated with using the ASTM methodology, the window systems may be designed using dynamic analysis or tested …”
4) Framing calculations under the static equivalent method is changed. Framing must now be shown adequate with a design load of 2x the glazing resistance instead of the 3-second equivalent blast load. In some cases (with small glass lites governing – Its usually the case that the Architect is unaware) this will be the difference between 50psf (typical 3-sec load) and 400 – 1200 psf! L/60 is used as a deflection limit now instead of L/160, but I don’t think that will help much – sections will need to be much stronger using this method.
5) Connections and anchors under static equivalent method is changed. The connections and anchors must be designed for either 1x or 2x the glazing resistance instead of the typical loop holes that we have seen 2x the 3-second load (usually 100psf). Anchors and connections at these loads will be difficult if the controlling glazing lite in an elevation is small. I think anchors into masonry and wood and light-gage steel will not be workable with this method.
6) We are now able to Use ultimate strength design instead of allowable stress, but again this helps little in light of the major changes above.
Connect with us on Linkedin
Check out other blog topics at our website.
Follow us on Facebook.
Email reprint request.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







